Let X be a nonempty set, K a positive-definite real-valued kernel on X×X with corresponding reproducing kernel Hilbert space Hk, and let R:Hk→R be a differentiable regularization function. Then given a training sample (x1,y1),…,(xn,yn)∈X×R and an arbitrary error function E:(X×R2)m→R∪{∞}, a minimizer f∗=f∈Hkargmin{E((x1,y1,f(x1)),…,(xn,yn,f(xn)))+R(f)} of the regularized empirical risk admits a representation of the form f∗(⋅)=∑i=1nαik(⋅,xi), Why it’s cool
Representer theorems are useful from a practical standpoint because they dramatically simplify the regularized ERM problem.
In most interesting applications, the search domain Hk for the minimization will be an infinite-dimensional subspace of L2(X) and therefore the search (as written) does not admit implementation on finite-memory and finite-precision computers.
In contrast, the representation of f∗(⋅) afforded by a representer theorem reduces the original (infinite-dimensional) minimization problem to a search for the optimal n-dimensional vector of coefficients α; it can then be obtained by applying any standard function minimization algorithm.